Wounds International 2(4) NovemberMade EasysPressure ulcers and hydrocolloids Made Easy

Pressure ulcers and hydrocolloids Made Easy

21/11/11 | Complex wounds, Pressure ulcers, Skin integrity | Fletcher J, Moore Z, Anderson I, Matsuzaki K.

Pressure ulcers and hydrocolloids Made EasyPressure ulcers pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems, and subject patients to considerable discomfort, pain and indignity. Although every effort should be made to prevent pressure ulcers, not all can be prevented. This article discusses the role of hydrocolloid dressings in the management of Category/Stage I and II pressure ulcers (Box 1).

The scale of the problem
The true frequency and associated cost of pressure ulcers is not known. Estimates suggest that in Europe approximately 18% of inpatients may have a pressure ulcer[1]. In 2004, it was estimated that the total cost of pressure ulcer care accounted for about 4% of UK National Health Service expenditure (approximately £2 billion)[2]. Furthermore, in the UK between 2003 and 2008, pressure ulcers were directly attributed as a cause of death in 4,708 people[3]. In the USA, it is believed that in the hospital sector the costs associated with pressure ulcers may be as high as $11 billion per annum[4].

Hydrocolloids and pressure ulcers
Hydrocolloids are widely used in the management of pressure ulcers5. They have been recommended for use in Category/Stage II and III pressure ulcers6, and increasingly are being used in the management of Category/Stage I pressure ulcers[7].

What is a hydrocolloid dressing?
Hydrocolloid dressings are made from a layer of gel-forming material attached to a semi-permeable film or foam backing. The gel layer comprises an adhesive matrix that contains a combination of absorbent materials such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, pectin and gelatin. The resulting dressing is absorbent and self adhesive, even in moist conditions[8].

Even though different hydrocolloid dressings may look similar, their fluid handling abilities can differ markedly9. Many hydrocolloid dressings are available in a variety of shapes, sizes and thicknesses. These may include products designed for specific anatomical areas (eg the sacrum or heel). Some products are very thin or have tapered edges that make them less likely to wrinkle, ruck or roll at the edges. These thinner products may also be semi-transparent allowing visualisation of the wound without the need to remove the dressing.

Variations in the backing materials may alter the 'slipperiness' of the dressing. Dressings that have a more 'slippery' outer surface reduce the coefficient of friction between the support surface and the patient, and so reduce the amount of shear and friction transmitted to the underlying skin. In this way, they may help to reduce the risk of further damage.

Many of the more recently available hydrocolloid dressings, including some thicker products, combine tapered edges and a smooth backing surface.


How do hydrocolloid dressings work?
Hydrocolloid dressings are believed to have a number of key properties that are useful in the management of pressure ulcers including:

  • production of a moist wound environment
  • management of exudate
  • facilitation of autolytic debridement
  • provision of a barrier to micro-organisms
  • helping with pain management[10].


Creating an optimal environment for healing
Hydrocolloid dressings create a moist wound environment that is known to be beneficial to wound healing11. Specifically, hydrocolloids are believed to promote angiogenesis, increase the number of dermal fibroblasts, stimulate the production of granulation tissue, and increase the amount of collagen synthesised[10].

 

 

Autolytic debridement
The moisture retentive properties of hydrocolloids help to gently soften and rehydrate necrotic tissue and slough, aiding autolytic debridement. This may take longer than sharp or biosurgical debridement (eg larval therapy), but may be more appropriate in some situations.

Prevention of infection and cross-infection
Hydrocolloids are adhesive and waterproof, and some hydrocolloids have been shown to act as a viral and bacterial barrier (eg to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)) provided the dressing remains intact and without leakage[12-14]. Hydrocolloid dressings may therefore be advantageous for use in areas such as the sacrum that are regularly subjected to heavy contamination. Several studies have examined whether the occlusive nature of hydrocolloid dressings increases the risk of infection. However, no evidence has been found to suggest that this is the case[15,16].

Protection of newly forming skin or Category/Stage I pressure ulcers
A hydrocolloid dressing with a smooth slippery backing reduces the friction coefficient of the patient-support surface interface[17]. The reduction in friction means that the patient is able to move more easily over the support surface and the area covered by the dressing is likely to be exposed to lower levels of pressure, shear and friction[7,18], reducing the risk of a Category/Stage I pressure ulcer progressing to deeper damage.

Semi-transparent hydrocolloid dressings may be used over reddened skin (Category/Stage I pressure ulcers) as it is possible to observe for deterioration without removing the dressing.

Pain management
The gel that forms during use of a hydrocolloid dressing makes removal easy and atraumatic. The moist, oxygen-depleted, environment produced by the dressing is thought to protect the nerve endings and so help to reduce pain in the wound bed[20,21].


What is the evidence?
Hydrocolloid dressings have been available for many years and have been extensively researched in a wide range of acute and chronic wound types. Many studies have confirmed that hydrocolloids are more effective than traditional dressings (such as gauze)[10] (Table 1).

 

 

Principles of pressure ulcer management
Accurate and ongoing assessment of the individual and the wound are essential for effective pressure ulcer management[22]. Bearing in mind the negative impact pressure ulcers have on health-related quality of life[23], it is essential that a systematic approach to assessment is adopted (Box 2). Involvement of the patient and their family is central to ensuring that individual problems and concerns are addressed6.

Assessment should include consideration of all activities of daily living6. In addition, selection of the correct topical wound dressing/intervention is dependent on having a clear understanding of the goal of treatment[24]. Development of the goal is facilitated through a detailed assessment of the wound, including the Category/Stage, location, size and shape, wound bed condition, exudate level and consistency, pain, malodour, peri-wound skin condition, and the presence or absence of infection[6].

 

 

When to use hydrocolloids for pressure ulcer management?
The management of individuals with pressure ulcers involves a myriad of interventions such as optimising nutrition, repositioning and use of specialised beds, mattresses and cushions, in addition to skin and continence care[7, 31]. Priority should be given to relieving the cause of pressure and to dealing with any general factors such as nutrition that may delay the process of healing. Local wound care should focus on achieving the optimum environment to facilitate healing and to achieve any other patient focused outcomes, such as relief of pain and reduction of exudate production.
Hydrocolloid dressings are believed to have a number of key properties that are useful in the management of pressure ulcers, eg:

  • protection of periwound skin
  • removal of necrotic tissue and slough
  • maintenance of a moist wound bed without over-hydrating the wound[22].


There is much debate within the literature as to the role of specific dressing types in addressing these issues in pressure ulcers[30, 32, 33]. Currently, hydrocolloid dressings are widely used in individuals with Category/Stage II pressure ulcers. They are also used as primary dressings in the management of Category/Stage III and IV pressure ulcers that are healing well and have become shallow. Hydrocolloids create a moist wound-dressing interface, facilitate autolysis and promote granulation tissue production, so creating an optimal local wound environment that is thought to be conducive to wound healing[30].

Thin hydrocolloid dressings (eg DuoDERM® SignalTM and DuoDERM® Extra Thin) are increasingly used in the management of Category/Stage I pressure ulcers. The slippery outer surface assists in reducing friction or shear to the underlying skin to protect it against further damage[7].

The moisture control provided by the hydrocolloid dressing may also have a role in maintaining tissue integrity and preventing deterioration of Category/Stage I pressure ulcers by preventing maceration. Good absorbency has been identified as an ideal characteristic of a dressing used for pressure ulcer prevention[34]. In addition, thin hydrocolloids are much easier to handle than are film dressings because they are less likely to fold on themselves.

Irrespective of the stage of healing, hydrocolloids are also useful as a secondary dressing because of their waterproof backing and ability to reduce shear and friction. The interaction between the hydrocolloid and the primary cavity filler must always be considered. For example, a hydrocolloid, Hydrofiber® or alginate cavity filler may be usefully covered with a hydrocolloid dressing, but amorphous gels tend to produce too wet an environment for a hydrocolloid dressing to manage.

Protection of periwound skin
Hydrocolloid dressings generally overlap the wound edge and extend onto healthy skin and protect periwound skin by:

  • providing a protective covering to the healthy periwound skin
  • absorbing wound exudate, so keeping excessive moisture and potentially damaging proteolytic enzymes away from healthy skin[35].

Autolytic debridement
In the presence of devitalised tissue, hydrocolloid dressings facilitate autolytic debridement by creating a moist wound-dressing interface[10]. However, the decision to use a hydrocolloid dressing will be depend on the level of exudate in the wound. If the wound has low to moderate exudate a hydrocolloid may be an appropriate treatment choice, but if the wound has a high level of exudate, a more absorbent primary dressing may be needed[9].

Moist wound healing
The gel formed when exudate is absorbed by a hydrocolloid maintains a moist wound-dressing interface while preventing fluid accumulation on the wound surface. Hydrocolloids are therefore also of value in the management of clean shallow granulating pressure ulcers.
Indeed, a systematic review noted that hydrocolloids were more effective than gauze dressings for enhancing wound healing, and were associated with lower levels of pain and reduced time for dressing changes[30].

Practicalities
Selecting a hydrocolloid dressing

Thicker hydrocolloid dressings are most appropriate for moderate levels of exudate. Conversely, if exudate levels are low or the dressing is being applied to skin at risk of further breakdown, a thin dressing may be most appropriate. Similarly, as the pressure ulcer heals and exudate levels drop, it may be necessary to use a thinner dressing.

Hydrocolloid dressings are not designed to be used with a secondary dressing. If exudate levels are high, an alternative dressing may be needed.

Where the skin is at risk of breakdown, ie in Category/Stage I pressure ulcers, choosing a thin hydrocolloid dressing (eg DuoDERM® SignalTM or DuoDERM® Extra Thin) will reduce the chances of it wrinkling and rucking and causing further problems[7].

Applying hydrocolloid dressings
The hydrocolloid dressing selected should be an appropriate size and shape for the wound, and overlap onto normal skin for about 3cm (1.25 inches) around the wound.

Hydrocolloid dressings should be warmed between the hands before application. Warming enhances the adhesiveness and pliability of the dressing, allowing it to better conform to the wound contours. Generally, it is advised that the patient does not put weight over the dressing for 20-30 minutes after application to give the dressing time to stick properly[36].

If leakage is or may be a problem from one side of the dressing, eg due to gravity, consider applying the dressing so that there is greater overlap onto the skin on that side[36]. Dressings with tapered edges are less likely to wrinkle, ruck or roll up. Hydrocolloid dressings are waterproof: patients can continue to shower or bath with the dressing in situ.

Frequency of dressing change
In general, hydrocolloid dressings are changed every three to five days, although some may be able to stay in place for up to seven days. However, more frequent changes may be required if exudate production is high, eg at the start of treatment, or if infection is suspected.

Removing hydrocolloid dressings
Unless early removal is required for clinical reasons, hydrocolloid dressings should stay in place until the gel bubble that forms comes close to the edge of the dressing[36]. The gel will allow easy and atraumatic removal of the dressing. If removal is required before the gel bubble has formed, careful removal by lifting the edge and peeling away the hydrocolloid while moistening the skin is recommended[36]. Some dressings incorporate a system to indicate when dressing change is required (eg DuoDERM® SignalTM).

For how long should a hydrocolloid be used?
The use of a hydrocolloid in the treatment plan may be continued as long as the dressing meets the clinical objectives. At each dressing change the wound and other clinical parameters should be assessed to determine what adjustments are required to the current plan of care[6]. The use of a systematic approach to assessment is particularly useful, ideally with use of a reliable and valid assessment tool[6].

At all times, careful documentation of the patient and wound is essential to enhance communication, provide a rationale for decision making and to demonstrate the delivery of high quality care[37]. Hydrocolloid dressings can be used on pressure ulcers to the point of wound closure.

Cost-effectiveness
Hydrocolloids have been shown to be more cost effective than gauze in the treatment of pressure ulcers[28, 29] (Table 1). This appeared to be mainly due to the lower clinical contact time required during treatment with a hydrocolloid dressing.

 

Summary
Pressure ulcers are a widespread problem and are highly costly in terms of resource usage and detrimental effect on quality of life. Hydrocolloid dressings promote moist wound healing, manage exudate, aid autolytic debridement and assist with pain management. They may also be used as a primary dressing for Category/Stage I or II pressure ulcers, shallow Category/Stage III or IV pressure ulcers, and for newly formed skin.The shiny outer surface and tapered edges of some newer hydrocolloid dressings help to protect tissues from further pressure-related damage by reducing the effects of pressure, shear and friction, and reducing the likelihood of rucking, wrinkling or edge rolling.

To cite this publication
Fletcher J, Moore Z, Anderson I, Matsuzaki K. Hydrocolloids and pressure ulcers Made Easy. Wounds International 2011; 2(4): Available from: http://www.woundsinternational.com

Author details
Fletcher J[1], Moore Z[2], Anderson I[3], Matsuzaki K[4].

  1. Senior Lecturer, Section of Wound Healing, Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, and Fellow, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, UK
  2. Immediate Past President of EWMA and Lecturer in Wound Healing & Tissue Repair and Research Methodologies, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
  3. Programme Tutor, Tissue Viability, and Reader in Learning and Teaching in Healthcare Practice, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
  4. Associate Professor, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Japan.


Supported by an educational grant from ConvaTec. The views expressed in this 'Made Easy' section do not necessarily reflect those of ConvaTec. Reprinted with permission of Wounds International.
(®/TM unless otherwise stated indicates the trademark of ConvaTec Inc.)



References

  1. Vanderwee K, Clark M, Dealey C, et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13: 227-35.
  2. Bennett G, Dealey C, Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age Ageing 2004; 33(3): 230-35.
  3. Hospitals 'name and shamed' on bedsores record which costs NHS £4bn a year. The Telegraph, 4 Jul 2011. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8613764/Hospitals-named-and-shamed-on-bedsores-record-which-costs-NHS-4bn-a-year.html (accessed 10 October 2011).
  4. Bales I, Padwojski A. Reaching for the moon: achieving zero pressure ulcer prevalence. J Wound Care 2009; 18(4): 137-44.
  5. Lohi J, Sipponen A, Jokinen JJ. Local dressings for pressure ulcers: what is the best tool to apply in primary and second care? J Wound Care 2010; 19(3): 123-27.
  6. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009. Available at: http://www.epuap.org/guidelines/Final_Quick_Treatment.pdf (accessed 23 September 2011).
  7. Wicks G. A guide to the treatment of pressure ulcers from grade 1-grade 4. Wound Essentials 2007; 2: 106-13.
  8. Heenan A. Frequenly asked questions: hydrocolloid dressings. World Wide Wounds, 1998. Available at: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/1998/april/Hydrocolloid-FAQ/hydrocolloid-questions.html (accessed 27 September 2011).
  9. Thomas S, Loveless P. A comparative study of the properties of twelve hydrocolloid dressings. World Wide Wounds 1997. Available at: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/1997/july/Thomas-Hydronet/hydronet.html (accessed 27 September 2011).
  10. Queen D. Technology update: Understanding hydrocolloids. Wounds International 2009; 1(1). Available at: http://www.woundsinternational.com/article.php?issueid=1&contentid=129&articleid=229 (accessed 23 September 2011).
  11. Finnie A. Hydrocolloids in wound management: pros and cons. Br J Community Nurs 2002; 7(7): 338-42.
  12. Wilson P, Burroughs D, Dunn J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and hydrocolloid dressings. Pharm J 1988; 243; 787-88.
  13. Lawrence JC. Reducing the spread of bacteria. J Wound Care 1993; 2: 48-52.
  14. Bowler PG, Delargy H, Prince D, Fondberg L. The viral barrier properties of some occlusive dressings and their role in infection control. Wounds 1993; 5(1): 1-8.
  15. Knowles EA, Westwood B, Young MJ, Boulton AJM. A retrospective study of the use of Granuflex and other dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 19-22 October 1993. London: Macmillan, 1993; 117-20.
  16. Boulton AJ, Meneses P, Ennis WJ. Diabetic foot ulcers: a framework for prevention and care. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7(1): 7-16.
  17. Nakagami G, Sanada H, Konya C, et al. Comparison of two pressure ulcer preventive dressings for reducing shear force on the heel. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006; 33(3): 267-72.
  18. Ohura T, Takahashi M, Ohura N Jr. Influence of external forces (pressure and shear force) on superficial layer and subcutis of porcine skin and effects of dressing materials: are dressing materials beneficial for reducing pressure and shear force in tissues? Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16(1): 102-7.
  19. Localio RA, Margolis D, Kagan SH, et al. Use of photographs for the identification of pressure ulcers in elderly hospitalized patients: validity and reliability. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 506-13.
  20. Wyatt D, McGowan DN, Najarian MP. Comparison of a hydrocolloid dressing and silver sulfadiazine cream in the outpatient management of second-degree burns. J Trauma 1990; 30(7): 857-65.
  21. Nemeth AJ, Eaglstein WH, Taylor JR, et al. Faster healing and less pain in skin biopsy sites treated with an occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127(11): 1679-83.
  22. Fletcher J. Wound assessment and the TIME framework. BJN 2007; 16(8): 462-66.
  23. Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 1175-83.
  24. Gray D, White R, Cooper P, Kingsley A. Applied wound management and using the wound healing continuum in practice. Wound Essentials 2010; 5: 131-39.
  25. Hollisaz MT, Khedmat H, Yari F. A randomized clinical trial comparing hydrocolloid, phenytoin and simple dressings for the treatment of pressure ulcers. BMC Dermatology 2004; 4(18):unpaginated.
  26. Chang KW, Alsagoff S, Ong K, Sim PH. Pressure ulcers - randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings. Med J Malaysia 1998; 53: 428-31.
  27. Graumlich JF, Blough LS, McLaughlin RG, et al. Healing pressure ulcers with collagen or hydrocolloid: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51(2): 147-54.
  28. Meaume S, Gemmen E. Cost-effectiveness and wound management in France: pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2002; 11(6): 219-24.
  29. Kerstein M, Gemmen E, van Rijswijk L, et al. Cost and cost effectiveness of venous and pressure ulcer protocols of care. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9(11): 651-63.
  30. Heyneman A, Beele H, Vanderwee K, Defloor T. A systematic review of the use of hydrocolloids in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 1164-73.
  31. Moore Z, Cowman S. The role of nutrition in the prevention and management of pressure ulcers. Geriatrics and Aging 2008; 11: 295-98.
  32. Bouza C, Saz Z, Muñoz A, Amate J. Efficacy of advanced dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2005; 14(5): 193-99.
  33. Gray M, Weir D. Prevention and treatment of moisture-associated skin damage (maceration) in the periwound skin. J Wound Ost Continence Nurs 2007; 34(2): 153-57.
  34. Butcher M, Thompson G. Pressure ulcer prevention: can dressings protect from pressure ulcer damage? An advertorial. Wounds International 2009; 1(1). Available at: http://www.woundsinternational.com/article.php?contentid=122&articleid=8793&page=3 (accessed 21 September 2011).
  35. Thomas S. The role of dressings in the treatment of moisture-related skin damage. World Wide Wounds 2008. Available at: http://www.worldwidewounds.org/2008/march/Thomas/Maceration-and-the-role-of-dressings.html (accessed 27 September 2011).
  36. Fletcher J. The benefits of using hydrocolloids. Nursing Times 2003; 99(21): 57.
  37. Dimond B. Pressure ulcers and litigation. Nursing Times 2003; 99 (5): 61-63.